Hello Joseph,
In fact the logic of your program works as expected. Your condition says: "If the 1, 2 and 3 checkboxes are checked, then allow the access". Then, if we check all the checkboxes, for example, this match the condition, and therefore the user can access.
What we can do? We can take in consideration all the checkboxes, just like I do in the below modification of your application:
LoginMatrix.zip
Probably we can also take another possible approach, because in software, normally we can take several ways to do the same. But for now you can take a look at the above modificated application. They only allow the access if only the 1, 2 and 3 checkboxes are checked, just like you wanted.
Hello,
I can't understand very well, Ade: finally you solve the problem?
Hello,
Please, choose the Menu App -> Javascript file. Take a look at the error and char line and look for something rare... I think the error is in your code, Ade, since the WebCam control does not use any "Audio" object... So take a look around in the app's Javascript file.
Hello Ade,
Please, try by deleting the "_Compiled" directory manually. I am not quite sure if the latest update (which involved WebCam enhancements) can cause the problem, if we are dealing with a previous compiled sample.
The WebCam sample works for me here and did not get any other report, then delete the "_Compiled" directory and try again.
Hello Samuel,
You can upgrade your App Builder copy. Now the WebCam control have a new "Metadata" event and the "runtime" variables "VideoWidth" and "VideoHeight". I modify a bit the WebCam app sample so you can take a look if you wanted.
Hello Samuel,
You're welcome. Honestly I am not an expert in the field, but we play here three different sizes:
1º The video size, who probably does not match the WebCam control size, but scaled
2º The captured video image, who have exactly the same dimensions than the video "says"
3º The Image control, who can shown the captured image, but not neccesary have the same size
I probably we need to think into the Image capture as a preview of the video capture. If I am not wrong, the Base64 representation of the captured image have the right size, that is, the video size, that is, independently of the Image control.
Again I want to say that, at least in some cases, having the real video size (the offered by the involved API) can be useful, so I want to put the appropiate "width" and "height" variables for the WebCam control. So we can use it if needed.
Hello Samuel,
No; it's not a problem with your webcam, Samuel, don't worry about that. The possible problem is we play with the video size in order to made the video capture. This information is only available at runtime, and the captured image size is the same than the video one. However, if we need to shown the captured image (not always needed) and we use for that an Image control (that's the way) then probably the image appear not well scaled, since the Image control sizes may is not the same than the video/captured image size.
If we maintain the application without scaling there the problem is reduced. However, I want to put available in runtime the video size (width and height) in a couple of new WebCam control variables. Then may we can use such information along the "SetStyle" action to set, if we wanted, the size of the Image control. I will inform here when this update are available Samuel.
If you need more help or have any further question, please, post it here.
P.S. Below we can see a capture of the WebCam sample application running here in my system, with a "Fake camera" program, just for another comparison.
Hello Shudir,
First of all thanks very much for your interest in my work at Small Editor. Certainly you found a bug in the program that I want take a look. In fact the about dialog "Unregistered" link put us to the program's website. You can purchase a new license of Small Editor from the below link:
https://www.decsoftutils.com/store
If you have any further question, please, don't hesitate to post it here or just contact me.
Hello Ade,
No problem. In fact this thread may can help to anyone in a similar situation. Maybe more common than can appear!
Hello Ade,
Are you trying to use an action into the designer? Actions are intended for the code editor Ade! What you really wanted (if I am not wrong) is to use a Timer control to be placed into the designer. If so, you must use the "Tools" dock panel and not the "Actions" dock panel.
Hello Joseph,
I am try to understand what you wanted, however, it's difficult (at least to me) to offer a possible solution, because I can't figure exactly about what we are talking about. Please, Joseph, can you provide (attach it here) a minimum app sample in order to try it?
Hello,
David is such a good person, he helped me fix my problem.
The best support I have ever seen.
David, App Builder is now working 100% and IE and Edge now work as well.
Mike
Good to know finally you got it! Thanks for your kindly words Mike!
Hello,
I never uses it before, but, ok. Go ahead!
Everybody can read the DecSoft support forum for learning purposes, however only DecSoft customers can post new threads. Purchase one or more licenses of some DecSoft products in order to give this and other benefits.
Posts by DecSoft 
DecSoft App Builder include a convenient Command Line Compiler, so you can compile your apps from the console. 
Compile, convert your modern HTML apps and games into Microsoft Windows executable programs without dependencies. 
DecSoft NeoPlugins are available in both runtime and designtime flavours to keep your apps as small as possible. 
Take a look at some frequently asked questions about us and our products! 
DecSoft Feeds